Text

Jeremy Guthrie, Detroit, and the most important series in a generation

Ned Yost tweaked the Royals starting rotation a bit this week. As a result, James Shields is now in a position to be the starter should the team be forced to play a 163rd game on Monday, Sept. 29.

Shields also would be set up to pitch a wild-card game on Tuesday, Sept. 30, or the first game of the American League Division Series that week.

More immediately, the Royals now will have left-hander Jason Vargas open the big series starting Friday with Detroit at Kauffman Stadium. Jeremy Guthrie, who normally would have started Friday, has been pushed to Sunday. I understand the thinking behind Yost’s slight adjustment. When it comes to putting Shields in a position to be available for critical games, I’m all for it. When it comes to this upcoming series against Detroit, however, why…in God’s name why…couldn’t he have gone Vargas, Shields and Duffy?

I’m well aware that Danny Duffy is just coming off a shoulder-soreness scare. Frankly, who gives a shit? He pitched a simulated game yesterday and said he felt absolutely fine. He’s scheduled to pitch again in an actual game early next week, a mere day or two after this critical series with the Tigers. If he’s healthy and rested enough to pitch then, surely he’s healthy and rested enough to pitch this weekend.

Guthrie is the Royals’ worst starting pitcher, with no close second. Occasionally he goes out and has an excellent game—like when he pitched against the A’s and his most recent start against Boston—but overall, he’s always a shot in the dark. That alone should more or less disqualify him for this weekend’s series. If not doesn’t do it, take a look at his numbers versus the Tigers this season. In 3 games, he’s pitched a total of 12.4 innings. That’s about 4.1 innings per outing. He’s given up 22 hits, and 15 runs. 15 fucking runs!! That’s an average of 5 solid runs per game!! Short of having his arm amputated, I’m not sure how he could possibly be a less likely candidate to start against Detroit.

It’s not as if the Royals are a comfortable 3-4 games ahead of the Tigers in the division and don’t really need these games. Quite the contrary. Every single one of these games should be considered a must-win for KC. Taking 2 out of 3 isn’t enough—not when you’ve gone 5-11 against them so far this season.

Whether it was Duffy, Ventura, or even the recently drafted Brandon Finnegan out there on the mound, it should not be Jeremy Guthrie. Not when the games are this important.

Photo
#tbt #birthdayboy #cake #showbiz #pizza #goodtimes

#tbt #birthdayboy #cake #showbiz #pizza #goodtimes

Link

President Johnson did more than just argue…he took action. In response to the assassination of JFK, President Johnson signed into law the Gun Control Act of 1968

In response to the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School…and the 2011 shootings in Tuscon, Arizona,..and the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting…and the Sikh Temple Shooting…and the recent shootings in Isla Vista…President Obama did nothing. 

Link

If given the choice between this, having rats on my face at night, or being burned to death…light me up. Seriously. 

Photoset

Coaching session.

Video

A touching tribute. 

Quote
"I don’t intend to show this cardboard-covered notebook, bearing the proud name of “diary,” to anyone. Unless I find a real friend, boy or girl, probably nobody cares."

— Anne Frank

Link

And they wonder why people don’t like, trust or respect the police. How can they?

Text

"An historic?" Wrong.

Have you ever been reading a newspaper article or something and come across a phrase like "the ceremony was an historic occasion?" God knows I have, and it has always confused me.

I don’t know about you, but I was taught to use “an” before words that begin with a vowel. The word “historic” clearly starts with the letter “H,” which is a consonant. Soooooo, what’s the deal?? 

I looked into it, and here’s what I found out: “an” is the form of the indefinite article that is used before a spoken vowel sound: it doesn’t matter how the written word in question is actually spelled. So, we say ‘an honour’, ‘an hour’, or ‘an heir’, for example, because the initial letter ‘h’ in all three words is not actually pronounced. By contrast we say ‘a hair’ or ‘a horse’ because, in these cases, the ‘h’ is pronounced.

There are three words in particular that tend to cause problems: historic, horrific, and hotel. If hotel was pronounced without its initial letter ‘h’ (i.e. as if it were spelled ‘otel’), then it would be correct to use an in front of it. The same is true of historic and horrific. If horrific was pronounced ‘orrific’ and historic was pronounced ‘istoric’ then it would be appropriate to refer to ‘an istoric occasion’ or ‘an orrific accident’. In the 18th and 19th centuries, people often did pronounce these words in this way.

Today, though, these three words are generally pronounced with a spoken ‘h’ at the beginning and so it’s now more logical to refer to ‘a hotel’, ‘a historic event’, or ‘a horrific accident’.

So there you have it, folks, I was right all along. Don’t write “an historic.” You’ll look like an idiot.

Link

Ahh, another family dispute successfully resolved through the use of guns.